Home | Purpose | Submissions | Archive | Contact
Keyword Search

Search
(Acrobat Reader Required)

Recent Postings

Donald T. Winder (1894-1968).
Cyrus Brady McCune (1850-1920).
Judge Frank W. Lyon (1856-1921).
Patrick Fitzpatrick (1857-1908).
Judge William A. Kerr (1867-1919).
Ferdinand Barta (1857-1928).


Viewing Land Settlement Category (21) found:


Pre-emption Act of 1841

The Pre-emption Act of 1841 was passed by the 27th Congress on September 4, 1841. It encouraged settlement of new states and territories by permitting settlers or squatters on government land to purchase up to 160 acres for not less than $1.25 per acre before that tract was offered for sale to the public. The settlers had to reside on and improve their claim before they could buy it. The Act was a shift away from a policy of selling public lands to raise money for the federal treasury and toward one that encouraged settlement of the country.

After the Homestead Act was passed in 1862, pre-emption claims decreased. The Pre-emption Act was repealed by the Land Revision Act of 1891.

View Article


Samuel J. Albright: "The First Organized Government of Dakota." (1898).

In the late 1850s, Samuel J. Albright, a St. Paul newspaper publisher, and other former Minnesotans, attempted to form a temporary "government" of Dakota, the land now encompassing the states of North Dakota and South Dakota. This government, it was hoped, would hasten the formation of a territory by Congress, while bringing law, order and prosperity to Dakota. It was not successful.

Albright's personal recollections of this endeavor were published first in 1898.

View Article


James H. Baker: "Government Lands" (1878).

James Heaton Baker was United States Surveyor General for Minnesota from 1875 to 1879. In 1878, he contributed a short article on the history of the public lands in the state for the annual report of the Minnesota Commissioner of Statistics. In it, Baker describes the background of federal grants of land to the state for schools (via the 1849 Organic Act and the 1857 Enabling Act), public buildings (via the Enabling Act), the university (in 1851), agricultural colleges (via the 1862 Morrill Act), swamp-lands (in 1860), and saline lands (via the Enabling Act). He concludes with a paragraph on land grants to railroads.

The Minnesota Supreme Court's decision in St. Paul & Chicago Railway Company v. Brown, 24 Minn. 517 (1877), is posted in an Appendix. There the court held that a railroad which had complied with a law granting it swamp-lands if it constructed a line from St. Paul to Winona was entitled under that legislation and contract law to select parcels of other state-owned swamp-lands even though they had already been appropriated for other public purposes.

View Article


Douglas A. Hedin: "The Conscientious Objector Amendments of 1877 to the State Militia Act" (2012).

In 1877, the Minnesota Legislature amended the state Militia Act to exempt certain conscientious objectors. The law, effective February 20, 1877, provided:

"All able-bodied male persons residing in the State of Minnesota, between the ages of eighteen (18) and forty-five (45) years, shall constitute the militia of this State, and be liable to perform military-duty in case of war, invasion, rebellion, or to maintain the public peace and enforce the laws, excepting:
"First. -- All persons who shall make and file with the clerk of the district court of their respective counties an affidavit that they are members of any religious society or organization by whose creed or discipline the bearing of arms is forbidden, and which affidavits shall be renewed every five (5) years.
"Second. -- Indians not taxed, idiots, lunatics, and persons who have been convicted of infamous crimes."

This article explores two questions: (1) why did the legislature pass this law? and (2) did it work? -- that is, did it accomplish what the legislature intended?

View Article


Jonathan Hughes: "The Great Land Ordinances." (1987).

"The Great Land Ordinances" is the name the late Jonathan Hughes gave to the ordinances of 1784, 1785, and 1787, which were passed by Congress under the Article of Confederation. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was, according to Hughes, "largely an update of the legislation of 1784, and it embraced the 1785 ordinance. That law laid out the scheme for celestial surveys, before the land went up for sale, with the lands divided into square townships of 36 square miles each, 6 miles by 6 miles. The 1785 survey system is part of the metaphorical American thumb-print and...is still the way Americans measure their lands." Because of the surveys, every parcel of land for sale had a "distinct trigonometric identity."

The Great Land Ordinances facilitated the development not only of the Northwest Territory, which encompassed the present states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin, but also the Middle West, West and Southwest in the next century. Those laws were "the colonial Americans' institutional thumbprint on the American continent all the way from the Ohio River to the Pacific."

This article was written by Jonathan R. T. Hughes, who taught economic history for three decades at Northwestern University. After his death in 1992, the Economic History Association established the Jonathan Hughes Prize for Excellence in Teaching Economic History.

This article appeared first in "Essays on the Economy of the Old Northwest," published by Ohio University Press in 1987.

View Article


Harold M. Hyman: "American Singularity: The 1787 Northwest Ordinance and the 1862 Homestead and Morrill Acts" (1985).

How unique or exceptional is America? To Dr. Harold M. Hyman, America is "singular" because at different times in its history, it adopted policies that increased individuals' "access to recognized avenues of mobility, opportunity and success." These policies were expressed in particular laws that encouraged individuals' access to land, to education, and to legal remedies.

Four examples of "access legislation" are the 1787 Northwest Ordinance, which increased access to ownership of land, stabilized property rights, and required the establishment of public schools, the 1862 Homestead and Morrill and Acts, which increased access to public lands in the West and education at state land-grant colleges, and the 1944 G.I. Bill, which expanded educational opportunities in the post-World War II era. These laws were imperfectly drafted, needed revision, and at times fell short of their goals because of the way they were implemented; nevertheless, they embodied many of the values and aspirations that inspired the Revolution.

Dr. Hyman explored the question of "American singularity" in the Russell Lectures delivered at the University of Georgia in 1985, and published the following year by the University of Georgia Press. Only Dr. Hyman's lectures on the Northwest Ordinance and the Homestead and Morrill Acts are reproduced in this article. To assist the reader, these laws are posted in an Appendix. These excerpts are posted on the MLHP with the permission of Dr. Hyman and the University of Georgia Press, which holds the copyright.

Dr. Harold M. Hyman is the William P. Hobby Professor of History Emeritus at Rice University. He is one of this country's foremost historians and has written acclaimed books on the constitution and the Civil War and Reconstruction Eras. He was the President of the American Society of Legal History in 1974-75.

View Article


William E. Lass: "The First Attempt to Organize Dakota Territory." (1991)

On May 27, 1857, the Dakota Land Company was incorporated in St. Paul by nine politically-connected investors, including Charles E. Flandrau, who was being considered for a position on the Minnesota Territorial Supreme Court. This article recounts the extraordinary story of how the Dakota Land Company schemed--and ultimately failed--to seize economic and political control of the vast lands west of Minnesota that now comprise much of South Dakota.

The article was written by William E. Lass, Professor Emeritus of History, Minnesota State University, Mankato. It appeared first as a chapter in "Centennial West: Essays on the Northern Tier States," published in 1991 by the University of Washington Press.

View Article


Douglass C. North & Andrew R. Rutten: "The Northwest Ordinance in Historical Perspective." (1987).

The Northwest Ordinance, passed by the Continental Congress on July 13, 1787, was, in the words of Professors Douglass North and Andrew Rutten, "a landmark in American economic history." Besides its famous guarantees of such rights as freedom of religion and prohibitions against slavery, taking of property without due process, and interference with contracts, it made it easy for settlers to secure clear title to land in the Northwest Territory, "making land easily transferrable and inheritable." It also provided that states formed from the Northwest Territory would join the Union on an equal footing with the original thirteen (eventually Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin would join). This proved to be significant because, as new states were organized and admitted, there was a shift in power to the frontier states, which held different views toward the disposal of the public lands than did nonpublic land states in the East, Mid-Atlantic and South. In response to changing economic and political pressures, public land policies evolved, a process that was encouraged not hindered by the Northwest Ordinance. The authors commend the Ordinance?s adaptive efficiency--that is, how well the structures it fostered adapted to new conditions to achieve allocative efficiency.

Douglass C. North was the co-recipient, with Robert C. Fogel, of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 1993. He is the Spencer T. Olin Professor in Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics, Washington University in St. Louis. Andrew R. Rutten teaches in the Department of Political Science at Stanford University, and is Associate Editor of "The Independent Review: A Journal of Political Economy."

Their article appeared first in "Essays on the Economy of the Old Northwest," published by Ohio University Press in 1987.

View Article


Frederick Jackson Turner: "The Significance of the Frontier in American History." (1893)

Twenty years ago, Martin Ridge, a noted historian who died in 2003, began an article in "Montana: The Magazine of Western History" with this question: "One of the favorite discussion topics among American historians is the question: what piece of American historical writing has been most influential in American life?" His answer followed:

" Frederick Jackson Turner's brief essay, 'The Significance of the Frontier in American History,' is the most logical choice for the most influential piece of historical writing. Turner's occupies a unique place in American history as well as in American historiography. There is a valid reason for this. It, more than any other piece of historical scholarship, most affected the American's self and institutional perceptions. 'The Significance of the Frontier in American History' is, in fact, a masterpiece.

" A masterpiece is not merely an outstanding work or something that identifies its creator as a master craftsman in the field. A masterpiece should change the way a public sees, feels, or thinks about reality. It should explicitly or implicitly tell much about its own times, but it should also cast a long shadow. It should have a significant impact on the way people at the time and afterward both perceive their world and act in it. . . . .

" From the time Turner's essay was published in the 1890s until today it has been the one piece of American historical writing that historians have praised, denounced, and tried to ignore. It has been called both a North Star and an albatross in American history."

In the century after Turner propounded his "frontier thesis" at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association in 1893, it was rejected, defended, discarded, and refined by other historians. Inevitably those interested in Minnesota's legal history will encounter in their research or casual reading articles and books written by historians who were influenced by Turner. For an unsuccessful and pretentious use of Turner's frontier thesis as a metaphor to criticize a recent book on originalism and a living constitution, see Justin Driver, "The Significance of the Frontier in American Constitutional Law," 2011 Supreme Court Review 345-398.

Turner's "masterpiece" is posted here.

View Article


Henry Titus Welles: "The Meeker Dam." (1899)

After Justice Bradley B. Meeker's term on the Territorial Court ended in 1853, he did not resume the practice of law. Instead he invested in real estate. Among his holdings was a large tract of land below St. Anthony Falls on the Minneapolis-St. Paul border. When Meeker's corporation attempted to get congressional assistance to build a dam across the Mississippi River--and acquire rights to 200,000 acres besides--Henry Titus Welles, a prominent Minneapolis lumberman, intervened to stop it. "The Meeker Dam" appeared first as a chapter in Welles's autobiography published in 1899.

View Article


"Claim Making and Preemption." (1855)

In 1855, the "Minnesota Republican" newspaper ran a series of articles to help newly arrived immigrants understand and adjust to their new land. This article on "Claim Making and Preemption" appeared in the issue of July 26, 1855.

View Article


"Pre-emption Law." (1859)

The passage of the Pre-emption Act of 1841 marked a change in federal policy from the sale of public land to raise revenue to offering lands to encourage the settlement of western states and territories. Pre-emptors--or settlers or squatters--could acquire title by making minor "improvements" to the land they lived on. To make the process understandable to settlers, many of whom were foreign-born, newspapers printed articles on how to file a pre-emption claim with the local federal Land Office. On May 19, 1859, "The Belle Plaine Enquirer" published "Pre-emption Law," which listed the requirements of the legislation.

View Article


"Directions on how to obtain public lands from an official source" (1878).

The 1878 Report of the Minnesota Commissioner of Statistics included a set of instructions on buying public lands that was subtitled, "Directions on how to obtain them, from an official source." It also listed the fees for certain claims and quoted excerpts from state exemption laws. This document may have been printed and distributed by U. S. Land Offices and state or county officials to potential homesteaders. It refers to several federal land laws---the Pre-emption Act of 1841 and the Timber Culture Acts---that were repealed in 1891. Statistics on the "Business of the U. S. Land Offices" in 1878 appear in an Appendix.

View Article


The Resolutions on Public Land. (1780)

In 1780, meeting before the Articles of Confederation were adopted, the Continental Congress adopted a Resolution calling upon the existing states--Virginia, North Carolina and Georgia were targeted--to cede their claims to lands in the Western Territory to the United States. A Recommendation to that effect was introduced on September 6, 1780, and a Resolution adopted on October 10, 1780. The latter provided:

"That the said lands shall be granted and settled at such times and under such regulations as shall hereafter be agreed on by the United States in Congress assembled, or any nine or more of them."

The Ordinances of 1784, 1785, 1787 and 1790 provided the subsequent "regulations" for the settlement of what became known as the Northwest and Southwest Territories.

View Article


The Ordinance of 1784.

On April 23, 1784, Congress, operating under the Articles of Confederation, adopted a resolution known as The Ordinance of 1784, which applied to land west of the Appalachian Mountains, north of the Ohio River and east of the Mississippi River -- land encompassed by the current states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin. It provided that settlers could petition Congress for authority to a form a temporary government and adopt the "constitution and laws of one of the existing states." When the new "state" acquired a population of 20,000 free inhabitants, it could draft a "permanent constitution" and seek admission to the union "on an equal footing" with the thirteen original states.

How the territories would be governed or settled before they became states, was determined by The Land Ordinance of 1785 and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787.

View Article


The Ordinance of 1785.

Operating under the Articles of Confederation, Congress adopted The Land Ordinance of 1785 on May 20, 1785. Because Congress lacked power to tax citizens of the United States, it aimed, through the Ordinance, to raise revenue through the sale of land in the Northwest Territory. It required that the land be surveyed, mapped and divided into "townships of six miles square." Each township was then subdivided into thirty-six sections of one square mile or 640 acres; thereafter, each section could be further divided for sale by settlers. The survey, using this rectangular methodology, contributed to the rapid and orderly settlement of the Northwest Territory -- the current states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin -- and made the transfer and sale of land easy.

The Ordinance also reserved Section 16 in each township for public schools ("There shall be reserved the lot No. 16, of every township, for the maintenance of public schools within the said township").

For the original public land survey plats and field notes of Minnesota, see the website of the Minnesota Geospatial Information Office.

View Article


The Northwest Ordinance (1787)

The Northwest Ordinance, effective July 13, 1787, organized the Northwest Territory, and established conditions for admitting new states to the union. It set forth six articles that constituted a "compact" between the original states and the people and future states in the new territory. That "compact" guaranteed such rights as trial by jury, right to bail, freedom of worship, sanctity of contract, respect for the property and lands of Indians and, significantly, it forbade slavery in the Northwest Territory.

View Article


Southwest Ordinance (also known as the Ordinance of 1790).

The Southwest Territory, which was defined as "Territory of the United States, South of the River Ohio," was created by the Southwest Ordinance enacted on May 26, 1790, out of land that was ceded to the U.S. federal government by the State of North Carolina. The Southwest Ordinance was modeled after the Northwest Ordinance with one exception: slavery was preserved. The admission to the union of Kentucky in 1792 and Tennessee in 1796 spelled the end of the Southwest Ordinance.

View Article


Homestead Act of 1862

The Homestead Act was signed by President Lincoln on May 20, 1862. By fulfilling certain statutory requirements--filing an application, "improving" the land by actually settling on and cultivating it, and filing for a deed after five years--a settler could acquire title to 160 acres of previously undeveloped land in new states and territories. According to Paul Gates, a noted historian of the public lands, it was "one of the most important laws which have ever been enacted in the history of this country." It was repealed in 1976, although homesteading was permitted in Alaska until 1986.

View Article


The Timber Culture Act (1873-1891).

Congress passed the Timber Culture Act in 1873 to encourage settlers to plant and grow trees on "western prairies." The following year, strict eligibility requirements and planting timetables were added. Amendments in 1878 loosened the schedules for "breaking" the prairie, "cultivating" the plowed land and planting trees. The law, however, was easily abused by settlers and ranchers; it never came close to accomplishing what Congress envisioned. Historians of the West give it a failing grade. It was repealed in 1891.

View Article


The Land Revision Act of 1891.

The Land Revision Act of 1891 repealed the Timber Culture Act (1873-1878) and the Preemption Act (1841), and revised other land laws. The last section of the statute authorizing the president to create forest reserves out of public lands has become so important that it is sometimes referred to as The Forest Reserve Act of 1891.

View Article